Last night was reportedly the first case of a federal
execution in any years. However, supported by the Democratic party,
federally funded executions are occurring by the thousands every day in
abortion clinics. Human life begins at conception, biology 101. Since Roe
v. Wade, there have been 62+ million executions of unborn human individuals in
the United States, all under the guise of health care. I am using the word
execution as abortion is the willful termination of the life of a unique human
individual.
Once upon a time, the Democratic party did not think that
abortion was so wonderful. Remember legal, safe and RARE? Now, the DNC platform
only wants to keep abortion legal. States, that try to enact regulations
that require abortions clinics to maintain conditions required of other medical
facilities, such as dental offices and outpatient surgical centers, are
bombarded by so-called choice supporters with objections that women’s right to
abortion are being denied. But, it costs money to maintain sanitary
conditions or design a clinic so that EMT’s can safely and quickly transport a
woman who has had a complication to an ER. Listen to the objections and
follow the money.
So, money trumps safe. What about rare? Despite the
denials of choice supporters, many women say that they did not think that they
had a choice other than an abortion. Where is the Democratic party’s concern
for these women? Women say that they felt pressured by others, by their
economic status, by their healthcare status, by the numbers in the family that
they were already caring for, by the choice between a baby, and getting and
education that would support them both. But these women can choose
abortion with no regrets, according to the so-called choice supporters. No
regrets? Many years ago, I read of a woman in her 70’s who found that the
underlying sadness in her life was the result of an abortion. Another
woman felt that she was unable to love her living children since she had ended
the life of her first child. Regret, depression and family problems have arisen
from abortions. Post-abortive programs would not exist if women did not
regret having abortions.
Women are given options at the abortion clinics. Just how
true is that? Women, who were once abortion clinic counselors, have
related how they had a script which skewed the options toward abortions, like
putting the cost of raising a child versus the cost of an abortion. How
many clinics offer guidance to social programs that would enable women to raise
her baby? Oh, that would require a social worker. Abortion clinics
are not into social work. Adoption is mentioned, but so also the
life-long grief of giving the baby to another person. What of the grief of an
abortion? Oh, women are supposed to feel relief. Feeling grief from an abortion
means someone shamed them into feeling grief. Supposedly pro-choice
supporters rail against pro-life clinics that offer information on fetal
developments and ultrasounds of the baby. They say that it shames women into
not choosing an abortion. Since when is having all the information one can have
before undergoing a life-changing procedure be shameful? Would they say the
same if a woman was undergoing surgery for breast cancer? How many women have
said that if they only knew they were not aborting “just a clump of cells” they
would never have had the abortion?
What is the Democratic party, the party that is portraying
itself as caring for the people, going to do for the women who do not want an
abortion but think that because of their life circumstances they do not have
any choice? Will the Democratic party push for the regulation of abortion
clinics that will at least compare to standards of other clinics or even hair
salons? Will the Democratic party promote more programs for women, and
men, who want to care for their babies? (There are men who are willing to raise
their baby on their own, but then the women would be unwilling incubators,
according to the supposedly pro-choice people. How ‘it’s all about me’ have we
become to put one’s convenience over the life of another?) Will the
Democratic party promote adoption and fund adoption agencies as much as it
funds abortion clinics, under the guise of health care? (This would include
religious organizations with acceptance of their adoption parameters, if the
woman chooses them.)
Or, will the Democratic party buckle to the so-called
pro-choice people? They say that they are for ‘my body, my choice’, but
their actions say that is a lie. Every baby kept or adopted is a loss for
an abortion clinic’s profits, or excess revenue over expenses if Planned
Parenthood. Hear the objections and follow the money. Is the
Democratic party really for the welfare of the people or a slave to the
abortion lobby and a minority of people, just as the Republican party is to the
NRA?
Time to put your policies where your mouth is. Give
women real choices. That will make abortion rare.
Want some ideas? Democrats for Life have ideas. https://www.democratsforlife.org/
Proposed
Platform Language to Unites Democrats Around Historic Democratic Principles
"We respect the conscience of each American and recognize
that members of our party have deeply held and sometimes differing positions on
issues of personal conscience, such as abortion and the death penalty. We
recognize the diversity of views as a source of strength, and we welcome into
our ranks all Americans who may hold differing positions on these and other
issues.
However, we can find common ground.
We believe that we can reduce the number of abortions because we are
united in our support for policies that assist families who find themselves in
crisis or unplanned pregnancies. We
believe that women deserve to have a breadth of options available as they face
pregnancy – including, among others, support and resources needed to handle the
challenges of pregnancy, adoption, and parenthood; access to education,
healthcare, and childcare; and appropriate child support. We envision a
new day without financial or societal barriers to bringing a planned or
unplanned pregnancy to term."
